Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLDGX vs RGWBX
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLDGX vs RGWBX
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDGX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 28.1B vs. FLDGX (623M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLDGX (0.87) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLDGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLDGX (27 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). FLDGX (1.46) and RGWBX (1.46) have similar cost to investors . FLDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 289.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). FLDGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. RGWBX (6.60). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.06 vs. FLDGX (12.44).
| FLDGX | RGWBX | FLDGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.46 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.986 | 9.579 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 623M | 28.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.95 | 6.60 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.69 | 51.28 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.44 | 15.06 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.26 | 102.45 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers