Advertisement
FLEX vs TEL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Flex Ltd. (FLEX) vs. TE Connectivity plc (TEL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FLEX has significantly outperformed TEL year-to-date (YTD, a measure of performance from the start of the calendar year), gaining 39% compared to TEL's 9%.
- Both companies operate in the electronic components industry within the technology sector, benefiting from demand in data centers, AI infrastructure, and electrification trends.
- FLEX shows stronger recent momentum, recently hitting a 52-week high amid robust quarterly revenue growth.
- TEL offers a dividend yield of 1.17% and higher profit margins (11.4% vs. FLEX's 3.2%), appealing to income-focused investors.
- FLEX carries higher leverage with a total debt-to-equity ratio of 98%, compared to TEL's 46%.
- Analysts rate both as Strong Buy, with average price targets implying upside potential.
Introduction
Flex Ltd. (FLEX) and TE Connectivity plc (TEL) are key players in the electronic components space, supporting critical supply chains for cloud computing, automotive electrification, and industrial automation. This comparison is particularly relevant for traders eyeing momentum in technology hardware and investors seeking exposure to AI-driven infrastructure growth. With both stocks showing resilience amid market volatility, understanding their relative performance, financial health, and sector positioning can inform decisions on portfolio allocation or short-term trades in the current environment.
FLEX Overview and Recent Performance
Flex Ltd. is a global provider of design, engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain solutions, serving industries like cloud/data centers, automotive, and renewable energy. In recent market activity, FLEX has demonstrated robust momentum, surging 39% YTD and recently achieving a 52-week high near $84.56. This follows strong third-quarter fiscal 2026 results in early 2026, with revenue of $7.1 billion, up 8% year-over-year, driven by demand in high-growth areas like AI infrastructure and renewables. Sentiment has been bolstered by analyst upgrades and expectations of earnings beats, though higher beta (1.20, a measure of volatility relative to the market) reflects sensitivity to sector cycles. Trading volume averages over 3.6 million shares, indicating solid liquidity.
TEL Overview and Recent Performance
TE Connectivity plc designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor solutions for harsh environments, targeting transportation, industrial, and communications markets. TEL has posted more moderate YTD gains of 9%, with shares trading around $247 and a market cap exceeding $72 billion. Recent performance reflects solid first-quarter fiscal 2026 results, including strong growth in digital data networks (up 70% year-over-year) and energy segments. Analyst previews highlight potential for Q2 earnings strength, supported by AI-related demand, though shares exhibit slightly higher beta (1.26). Profitability remains a strength, with operating margins near 21%.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots from a library of over 350, curated based on real-time market suitability and historical outperformance. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend trading, dip buying, and multi-ticker portfolios across semiconductors, energy, ETFs, and more, with timeframes from minutes to weeks. Top trending bots display impressive stats: annualized returns ranging from 15% to 168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 22 in some cases. Whether focusing on swing trades or volatility plays, they adapt to current conditions like the semiconductor boom. Traders can copy these bots for automated signals—explore the page to find ones matching your risk profile.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FLEX operates primarily as a contract manufacturer (diversified EMS, electronics manufacturing services), emphasizing scalability for clients in cloud and autos, while TEL focuses on proprietary connectors and sensors, enabling higher margins (11.4% profit margin vs. 3.2%) but potentially slower growth scalability. Recent momentum favors FLEX with superior YTD returns and revenue growth (quarterly 7.7% YoY), contrasting TEL's steadier path bolstered by acquisitions and dividends. Risk profiles differ: FLEX's higher debt-to-equity (98%) exposes it to interest rate shifts, versus TEL's conservative 46% balance and free cash flow of $2B TTM. Both benefit from sector tailwinds like AI datacom, but FLEX shows greater price volatility and upside potential per analyst targets.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward FLEX for its consistent upward trend, superior YTD momentum, and alignment with high-growth manufacturing demand in recent market activity. While TEL offers stability and dividends, FLEX's relative positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance amid tech sector strength.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLEX is a Hold and TEL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLEX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTEL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLEX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TEL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLEX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLEX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TEL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
FLEX (@Electronic Components) experienced а -3.03% price change this week, while TEL (@Electronic Components) price change was -0.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLEX is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
TEL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-0.78% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| FLEX | TEL | FLEX / TEL | |
| Capitalization | 50.7B | 59.9B | 85% |
| EBITDA | 1.89B | 4.73B | 40% |
| Gain YTD | 128.169 | -9.569 | -1,339% |
| P/E Ratio | 59.17 | 20.95 | 282% |
| Revenue | 26.8B | 18.7B | 143% |
| Total Cash | 3.06B | 1.11B | 275% |
| Total Debt | 5.02B | 5.66B | 89% |
FLEX | TEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TEL's Valuation (29) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLEX (67). This means that TEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLEX’s over the last 12 months.
FLEX's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TEL (31). This means that FLEX’s stock grew similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.
TEL's SMR Rating (42) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FLEX (51). This means that TEL’s stock grew similarly to FLEX’s over the last 12 months.
FLEX's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TEL (61). This means that FLEX’s stock grew similarly to TEL’s over the last 12 months.
FLEX's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEL (88). This means that FLEX’s stock grew significantly faster than TEL’s over the last 12 months.
| FLEX | TEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 13 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 54% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SZK | 10.78 | 0.07 | +0.65% |
| ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples | |||
| CSPF | 26.11 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Cohen & Steers Pref & Inc Opps Act ETF | |||
| LVHD | 41.97 | -0.30 | -0.70% |
| Franklin U.S. Low Volatility Hi Div ETF | |||
| FMCX | 36.03 | -0.39 | -1.06% |
| FM Focus Equity ETF | |||
| AIQ | 61.04 | -1.39 | -2.23% |
| Global X Artfcl Intlgc & Tech ETF | |||
FLEX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLEX has been closely correlated with JBL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLEX jumps, then JBL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLEX | 100% | -4.00% | ||
| JBL - FLEX | 74% Closely correlated | -4.08% | ||
| GLW - FLEX | 61% Loosely correlated | -7.91% | ||
| BHE - FLEX | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| TTMI - FLEX | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| PLXS - FLEX | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||
TEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEL has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEL jumps, then APH could also see price increases.