FLGC
Price
$20.45
Change
-$0.25 (-1.21%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
11.83M
GTBIF
Price
$8.69
Change
-$0.12 (-1.36%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLGC vs GTBIF

Header iconFLGC vs GTBIF Comparison
Open Charts FLGC vs GTBIFBanner chart's image
Flora Growth
Price$20.45
Change-$0.25 (-1.21%)
Volume$7.32K
Capitalization11.83M
Green Thumb Industries
Price$8.69
Change-$0.12 (-1.36%)
Volume$478.95K
Capitalization2B
FLGC vs GTBIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLGC vs. GTBIF commentary
Sep 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLGC is a Hold and GTBIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 01, 2025
Stock price -- (FLGC: $20.45 vs. GTBIF: $8.69)
Brand notoriety: FLGC and GTBIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLGC: 70% vs. GTBIF: 75%
Market capitalization -- FLGC: $11.83M vs. GTBIF: $2B
FLGC [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $11.83M. GTBIF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $69.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLGC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTBIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTBIF is a better buy in the long-term than FLGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTBIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GTBIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTBIF is a better buy in the short-term than FLGC.

Price Growth

FLGC (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -3.61% price change this week, while GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +4.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +67.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +80.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+1.55% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTBIF($2B) has a higher market cap than FLGC($11.8M). GTBIF YTD gains are higher at: 6.364 vs. FLGC (-49.091). GTBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 338M vs. FLGC (-14.64M). GTBIF has more cash in the bank: 177M vs. FLGC (1.47M). FLGC has less debt than GTBIF: FLGC (7.77M) vs GTBIF (523M). GTBIF has higher revenues than FLGC: GTBIF (1.15B) vs FLGC (52.4M).
FLGCGTBIFFLGC / GTBIF
Capitalization11.8M2B1%
EBITDA-14.64M338M-4%
Gain YTD-49.0916.364-771%
P/E RatioN/A79.00-
Revenue52.4M1.15B5%
Total Cash1.47M177M1%
Total Debt7.77M523M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GTBIF: Fundamental Ratings
GTBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLGCGTBIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HQI9.760.25
+2.63%
HireQuest
SAND11.160.19
+1.73%
Sandstorm Gold Ltd
CNP37.710.23
+0.61%
CenterPoint Energy
SINT4.15-0.09
-2.12%
SiNtx Technologies Inc.
AXL5.82-0.15
-2.51%
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings

FLGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLGC has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLGC jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLGC
1D Price
Change %
FLGC100%
-1.21%
SNDL - FLGC
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
ACET - FLGC
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.09%
SXTC - FLGC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMCC - FLGC
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
GTBIF - FLGC
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
More

GTBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with TCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then TCNNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTBIF
1D Price
Change %
GTBIF100%
-1.36%
TCNNF - GTBIF
83%
Closely correlated
-2.98%
CURLF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
VRNOF - GTBIF
80%
Closely correlated
+3.03%
TSNDF - GTBIF
78%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
CRLBF - GTBIF
71%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More