FLMCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
JUBPF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
260.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLMCF vs JUBPF

Header iconFLMCF vs JUBPF Comparison
Open Charts FLMCF vs JUBPFBanner chart's image
First Lithium Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.03 (-50.00%)
Volume$1.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Jubilee Metals Group
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$58K
Capitalization260.43M
FLMCF vs JUBPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLMCF vs. JUBPF commentary
Jul 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMCF is a Hold and JUBPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FLMCF: $0.03 vs. JUBPF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FLMCF and JUBPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLMCF: 28% vs. JUBPF: 204%
Market capitalization -- FLMCF: $0 vs. JUBPF: $260.43M
FLMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. JUBPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $260.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLMCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJUBPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JUBPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, JUBPF is a better buy in the long-term than FLMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLMCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JUBPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLMCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • JUBPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JUBPF is a better buy in the short-term than FLMCF.

Price Growth

FLMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JUBPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.33% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JUBPF YTD gains are higher at: 12.941 vs. FLMCF (-43.973).
FLMCFJUBPFFLMCF / JUBPF
CapitalizationN/A260M-
EBITDAN/A34.2M-
Gain YTD-43.97312.941-340%
P/E RatioN/A15.85-
RevenueN/A140M-
Total CashN/A11.7M-
Total DebtN/A16.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUBPF: Fundamental Ratings
JUBPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLMCFJUBPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUBPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OFALX18.75N/A
N/A
Olstein All Cap Value C
RYMVX78.63N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value A
CREAX9.66N/A
N/A
Columbia Real Estate Equity A
JDIVX16.65N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value Intl NAV
JIUCX17.28-0.06
-0.35%
JPMorgan Developed International Value C

FLMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLMCF and EUEMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLMCF and EUEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLMCF
1D Price
Change %
FLMCF100%
N/A
EUEMF - FLMCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JIAXF - FLMCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - FLMCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JUBPF - FLMCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - FLMCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More

JUBPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JUBPF and PXCLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JUBPF and PXCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUBPF
1D Price
Change %
JUBPF100%
N/A
PXCLF - JUBPF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLMCF - JUBPF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIGCF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+14.58%
DNN - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.65%
ENCTF - JUBPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More