Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMX vs ILF
FLMX vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLMX vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
Price$32.47
Change-$0.18 (-0.55%)
Volume$638
Net Assets60.18M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$29.59
Change-$0.56 (-1.86%)
Volume$28.33K
Net Assets2.25B
FLMX vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMX vs. ILF commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMX is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 2.25B vs. FLMX (60.2M). ILF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLMX: ILF (47.585) vs FLMX (45.149). FLMX was incepted earlier than ILF: FLMX (8 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLMX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). ILF has a higher turnover FLMX (10.58) vs FLMX (10.58).
| FLMX | ILF | FLMX / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 45.149 | 47.585 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 60.2M | 2.25B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 10.58 | 18.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 3.77 | 5.07 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLMX | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLMX | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| OMAB - FLMX | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| ACGP - FLMX | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.06% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||