Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMX vs ILF
FLMX vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLMX vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
Price$30.40
Change+$0.16 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.46M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$25.96
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$200
Net Assets1.65B
FLMX vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMX vs. ILF commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMX is a Buy and ILF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.65B vs. FLMX (62.5M). FLMX has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLMX (34.445) vs ILF (26.928). FLMX was incepted earlier than ILF: FLMX (8 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLMX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.48). ILF has a higher turnover FLMX (10.58) vs FLMX (10.58).
| FLMX | ILF | FLMX / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 34.445 | 26.928 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 62.5M | 1.65B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.48 | 40% |
| Turnover | 10.58 | 18.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 4.16 | 5.98 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLMX | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLMX | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| OMAB - FLMX | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| AC - FLMX | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.82% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +2.05% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 74% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| NU - ILF | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
More | ||||