Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMX vs ILF
FLMX vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLMX vs ILF
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF
Price$30.81
Change+$0.47 (+1.55%)
Volume$10.05K
Net Assets63.74M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$27.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.30%)
Volume$2.75M
Net Assets1.76B
FLMX vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMX vs. ILF commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMX is a Buy and ILF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.76B vs. FLMX (63.7M). FLMX has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLMX (36.967) vs ILF (32.264). FLMX was incepted earlier than ILF: FLMX (8 years) vs ILF (24 years). FLMX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). ILF has a higher turnover FLMX (10.58) vs FLMX (10.58).
| FLMX | ILF | FLMX / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 36.967 | 32.264 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 63.7M | 1.76B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 10.58 | 18.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 4.04 | 5.50 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLMX | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLMX | 100% | +1.54% | ||
| OMAB - FLMX | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| AC - FLMX | -6% Poorly correlated | +0.30% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.89% | ||
More | ||||