Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLMX vs ILF
FLMX vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLMX vs ILF
FLMX vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLMX vs. ILF commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLMX is a Hold and ILF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 3.83B vs. FLMX (85.4M). ILF has a higher annual dividend yield than FLMX: ILF (15.246) vs FLMX (11.645). FLMX was incepted earlier than ILF: FLMX (9 years) vs ILF (25 years). FLMX (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than ILF (0.47). FLMX has a higher turnover ILF (10.00) vs ILF (10.00).
| FLMX | ILF | FLMX / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 11.645 | 15.246 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 85.4M | 3.83B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.19 | 0.47 | 40% |
| Turnover | 21.00 | 10.00 | 210% |
| Yield | 3.81 | 3.34 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLMX | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMX has been loosely correlated with Q. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLMX jumps, then Q could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLMX | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| Q - FLMX | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| PAC - FLMX | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.39% | ||
| OMAB - FLMX | -3% Poorly correlated | -2.05% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 84% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 73% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| NU - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| VIV - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||