Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLN vs ILF
FLN vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLN vs ILF
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$19.18
Change+$0.12 (+0.63%)
Volume$4.25K
Net Assets12.42M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$25.49
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.52M
Net Assets1.71B
FLN vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLN vs. ILF commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLN is a Hold and ILF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.72B vs. FLN (12.4M). FLN has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLN (27.053) vs ILF (21.903). FLN was incepted earlier than ILF: FLN (14 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover ILF (7.00) vs ILF (7.00).
| FLN | ILF | FLN / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 27.053 | 21.903 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 12.4M | 1.72B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.48 | 167% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 7.00 | 1,071% |
| Yield | 4.57 | 6.16 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLN | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 85% | 14 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with NU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then NU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| NU - FLN | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| PAGS - FLN | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| AC - FLN | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| NU - ILF | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||