Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLN vs ILF
FLN vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLN vs ILF
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$20.77
Change+$0.11 (+0.53%)
Volume$200
Net Assets16.74M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$28.07
Change+$0.26 (+0.93%)
Volume$278
Net Assets1.92B
FLN vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLN vs. ILF commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLN is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.92B vs. FLN (16.7M). FLN has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FLN (39.313) vs ILF (36.180). FLN was incepted earlier than ILF: FLN (14 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| FLN | ILF | FLN / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 39.313 | 36.180 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 16.7M | 1.92B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.47 | 170% |
| Turnover | 75.00 | 18.00 | 417% |
| Yield | 2.15 | 5.16 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLN | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | -1.31% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| NU - FLN | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| PAGS - FLN | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -1.38% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 76% Closely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 66% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
More | ||||