Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLNCX vs FQMDX
FLNCX vs FQMDX Comparison
Open Charts FLNCX vs FQMDX
FLNCX vs FQMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLNCX vs. FQMDX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNCX is a Hold and FQMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLNCX has more cash in the bank: 489M vs. FQMDX (316M). FQMDX pays higher dividends than FLNCX: FQMDX (3.31) vs FLNCX (3.09). FLNCX was incepted earlier than FQMDX: FLNCX (40 years) vs FQMDX (8 years). FQMDX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FLNCX (0.81). FQMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.14 vs. FLNCX (18.00). FLNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQMDX (4%) vs FQMDX (4%). FQMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLNCX: FQMDX (1000) vs FLNCX (2500). FLNCX (7.56) and FQMDX (7.34) have marching annual gain over last year. FLNCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.41 vs. FQMDX (-0.44).
| FLNCX | FQMDX | FLNCX / FQMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.90 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.90 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.533 | 1.923 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 112% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 489M | 316M | 155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 3.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 7.34 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 9.88 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.41 | -0.44 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers