Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLNCX vs FTAZX
FLNCX vs FTAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLNCX vs FTAZX
FLNCX vs FTAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLNCX vs. FTAZX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNCX is a Hold and FTAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTAZX has more cash in the bank: 603M vs. FLNCX (489M). FTAZX pays higher dividends than FLNCX: FTAZX (3.37) vs FLNCX (3.09). FLNCX was incepted earlier than FTAZX: FLNCX (40 years) vs FTAZX (39 years). FLNCX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FTAZX (0.67). FLNCX (18.00) and FTAZX (17.42) have comparable annual turnover. FLNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTAZX (4%) vs FTAZX (4%). FTAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLNCX: FTAZX (1000) vs FLNCX (2500). FTAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. FLNCX (7.56). FTAZX return over 5 years is better than : 0.36 vs. FLNCX (-0.41).
| FLNCX | FTAZX | FLNCX / FTAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.67 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.67 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.533 | 1.965 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 112% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 489M | 603M | 81% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 3.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 8.22 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 12.48 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.41 | 0.36 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.73 | 3.86 | 252% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers