Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLNCX vs MSNCX
FLNCX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FLNCX vs MSNCX
FLNCX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLNCX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLNCX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. FLNCX (489M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FLNCX: MSNCX (3.29) vs FLNCX (3.09). FLNCX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FLNCX (40 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FLNCX (0.81). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FLNCX (18.00). MSNCX (4%) and FLNCX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. MSNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLNCX: MSNCX (1000) vs FLNCX (2500). MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.08 vs. FLNCX (7.56). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.22 vs. FLNCX (-0.41).
| FLNCX | MSNCX | FLNCX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.84 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.86 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.533 | 2.032 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 99% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 489M | 570M | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.09 | 3.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 8.08 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 11.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.41 | 3.22 | -13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.73 | 15.65 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement