Advertisement
FLO vs HLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a StrongBuy and HLF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
HLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.53% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| FLO | HLF | FLO / HLF | |
| Capitalization | 5B | 1B | 499% |
| EBITDA | 345M | 482M | 72% |
| Gain YTD | -20.820 | 23.169 | -90% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.74 | 6.42 | 635% |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 5.06B | 101% |
| Total Cash | 22.5M | 575M | 4% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 2.77B | 49% |
FLO | HLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLO's Valuation (8) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (63) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (52) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as FLO (98) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.
| FLO | HLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 21 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GPIX | 49.18 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Inc ETF | |||
| FNDE | 32.79 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Schwab Fundamental Emerging MarketsEqETF | |||
| GEMD | 40.74 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
| Goldman Sachs Access Emrg Mkts USD BdETF | |||
| DJD | 51.97 | -0.27 | -0.51% |
| Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF | |||
| MVV | 61.55 | -1.07 | -1.71% |
| ProShares Ultra MidCap400 | |||
FLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | -1.79% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| FLO - HLF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
| THS - HLF | 28% Poorly correlated | -6.19% | ||
| CENTA - HLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
| KHC - HLF | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||