FLO
Price
$18.26
Change
+$0.29 (+1.61%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
5B
27 days until earnings call
HLF
Price
$6.44
Change
+$0.20 (+3.21%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs HLF

Header iconFLO vs HLF Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs HLFBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$18.26
Change+$0.29 (+1.61%)
Volume$1.19M
Capitalization5B
Herbalife
Price$6.44
Change+$0.20 (+3.21%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization1B
FLO vs HLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. HLF commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and HLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $18.26 vs. HLF: $6.44)
Brand notoriety: FLO and HLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 54% vs. HLF: 61%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. HLF: $1B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. HLF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the long-term than HLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than HLF.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

HLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+2.00% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($5B) has a higher market cap than HLF($1B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than HLF: FLO (40.74) vs HLF (6.42). HLF YTD gains are higher at: -3.737 vs. FLO (-10.477). HLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 482M vs. FLO (345M). HLF has more cash in the bank: 575M vs. FLO (22.5M). FLO has less debt than HLF: FLO (1.35B) vs HLF (2.77B). FLO (5.09B) and HLF (5.06B) have equivalent revenues.
FLOHLFFLO / HLF
Capitalization5B1B499%
EBITDA345M482M72%
Gain YTD-10.477-3.737280%
P/E Ratio40.746.42635%
Revenue5.09B5.06B101%
Total Cash22.5M575M4%
Total Debt1.35B2.77B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs HLF: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
HLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8164
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
498
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7380
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (61) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's SMR Rating (8) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as HLF (80) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.

HLF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as FLO (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCIIX15.08N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Insghts Instl
ESECX28.49N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq C
HDOGX13.34N/A
N/A
Hennessy Total Return Investor
SLANX27.40N/A
N/A
DWS Latin America Equity A
TRMIX27.90N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value I

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+1.61%
GIS - FLO
69%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
CPB - FLO
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
KHC - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
CAG - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
SJM - FLO
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
More

HLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLF
1D Price
Change %
HLF100%
+3.21%
USNA - HLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
HAIN - HLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+10.41%
FRPT - HLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
FLO - HLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
CENTA - HLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More