FLO
Price
$19.21
Change
+$0.25 (+1.32%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
5B
41 days until earnings call
INGR
Price
$136.41
Change
+$1.09 (+0.81%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.69B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs INGR

Header iconFLO vs INGR Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs INGRBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$19.21
Change+$0.25 (+1.32%)
Volume$3.74M
Capitalization5B
Ingredion
Price$136.41
Change+$1.09 (+0.81%)
Volume$446.94K
Capitalization7.69B
FLO vs INGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. INGR commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and INGR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $19.21 vs. INGR: $136.41)
Brand notoriety: FLO and INGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 164% vs. INGR: 67%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. INGR: $7.69B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. INGR’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $7.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINGR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INGR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, INGR is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INGR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • INGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INGR is a better buy in the short-term than FLO.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while INGR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

INGR is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.23% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INGR($7.69B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than INGR: FLO (40.74) vs INGR (12.21). INGR YTD gains are higher at: 0.338 vs. FLO (-5.820). INGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.17B vs. FLO (345M). INGR has more cash in the bank: 409M vs. FLO (22.5M). FLO has less debt than INGR: FLO (1.35B) vs INGR (2.4B). INGR has higher revenues than FLO: INGR (8.16B) vs FLO (5.09B).
FLOINGRFLO / INGR
Capitalization5B7.69B65%
EBITDA345M1.17B29%
Gain YTD-5.8200.338-1,723%
P/E Ratio40.7412.21334%
Revenue5.09B8.16B62%
Total Cash22.5M409M6%
Total Debt1.35B2.4B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs INGR: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
INGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2511
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9011
SMR RATING
1..100
4951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9628
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (12) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as INGR (40) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (90) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (49) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as INGR (51) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FLO (73) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

INGR's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (96) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOINGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPTI28.770.26
+0.91%
SPDR® Portfolio Intmdt Term Trs ETF
PWS30.710.01
+0.05%
Pacer WealthShield ETF
GSEU38.24-0.49
-1.27%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Europe Eq ETF
HFRO4.95-0.19
-3.70%
Highland Opportunities and Income Fund
TPLC41.22-1.92
-4.45%
Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+1.32%
GIS - FLO
67%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
CPB - FLO
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
CAG - FLO
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
KHC - FLO
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
SJM - FLO
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More

INGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with POST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then POST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INGR
1D Price
Change %
INGR100%
+0.81%
POST - INGR
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
FLO - INGR
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
MDLZ - INGR
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
GIS - INGR
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
JJSF - INGR
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
More