Advertisement
CAG vs INGR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a Buy and INGR is a Buy.
CAG | INGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 70 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAG's Valuation (4) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as INGR (16) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as CAG (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's SMR Rating (60) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAG (96) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as INGR (70) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to INGR’s over the last 12 months.
INGR's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAG (97) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that INGR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.
| CAG | INGR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 51% | 17 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 45% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while INGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- INGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INGR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- INGR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CAG (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -5.35% price change this week, while INGR (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -0.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAG is expected to report earnings on Sep 30, 2026.
INGR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-3.35% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HIBL | 115.08 | 3.40 | +3.04% |
| Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X ETF (HIBL) | |||
| BUYO | 32.23 | 0.17 | +0.52% |
| KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF (BUYO) | |||
| CGDV | 49.46 | 0.17 | +0.34% |
| Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) | |||
| IBIE | 25.64 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2028 Term TIPS ETF (IBIE) | |||
| MLPI | 51.10 | -0.83 | -1.60% |
| NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) | |||
CAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
INGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INGR has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INGR jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INGR | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| FLO - INGR | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| CAG - INGR | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| KHC - INGR | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| MDLZ - INGR | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| GIS - INGR | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.42% | ||
More | ||||