FLO
Price
$17.21
Change
-$0.38 (-2.16%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5B
5 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$50.83
Change
-$0.63 (-1.22%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs LW

Header iconFLO vs LW Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs LWBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$17.21
Change-$0.38 (-2.16%)
Volume$1.87M
Capitalization5B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$50.83
Change-$0.63 (-1.22%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization15.38B
FLO vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. LW commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and LW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $17.21 vs. LW: $50.83)
Brand notoriety: FLO and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 85% vs. LW: 50%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. LW: $15.38B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.85% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than LW: FLO (40.74) vs LW (13.62). FLO YTD gains are higher at: -15.625 vs. LW (-22.935). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. FLO (345M). FLO has less debt than LW: FLO (1.35B) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than FLO: LW (6.35B) vs FLO (5.09B).
FLOLWFLO / LW
Capitalization5B15.4B32%
EBITDA345M1.34B26%
Gain YTD-15.625-22.93568%
P/E Ratio40.7413.62299%
Revenue5.09B6.35B80%
Total Cash22.5MN/A-
Total Debt1.35B3.63B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5161
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4842
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (9) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (34). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (100). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (48). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (78). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (98). This means that LW’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUSK.X0.1018630.007903
+8.41%
Dusk cryptocurrency
ICX.X0.1127380.004187
+3.86%
ICON cryptocurrency
AYI256.560.27
+0.11%
Acuity Inc
HTH30.26-0.14
-0.46%
Hilltop Holdings
NULS.X0.050434-0.000367
-0.72%
NULS cryptocurrency

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-2.16%
GIS - FLO
70%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
KHC - FLO
67%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
CPB - FLO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
CAG - FLO
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
SJM - FLO
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More