FLO
Price
$19.40
Change
+$0.33 (+1.73%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5B
81 days until earnings call
LW
Price
$55.80
Change
-$1.01 (-1.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
39 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs LW

Header iconFLO vs LW Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs LWBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$19.40
Change+$0.33 (+1.73%)
Volume$1.98M
Capitalization5B
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$55.80
Change-$1.01 (-1.78%)
Volume$2.04M
Capitalization15.38B
FLO vs LW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. LW commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and LW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FLO: $19.40 vs. LW: $55.80)
Brand notoriety: FLO and LW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 100% vs. LW: 76%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. LW: $15.38B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. LW’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $15.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than LW.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +4.81% price change this week, while LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -4.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than LW: FLO (40.74) vs LW (13.62). FLO YTD gains are higher at: -6.099 vs. LW (-16.000). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. FLO (345M). FLO has less debt than LW: FLO (1.35B) vs LW (3.63B). LW has higher revenues than FLO: LW (6.35B) vs FLO (5.09B).
FLOLWFLO / LW
Capitalization5B15.4B32%
EBITDA345M1.34B26%
Gain YTD-6.099-16.00038%
P/E Ratio40.7413.62299%
Revenue5.09B6.35B80%
Total Cash22.5MN/A-
Total Debt1.35B3.63B37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs LW: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
LW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8670
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
5142
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7565
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9613
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (14) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (37). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (100). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (51). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

LW's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (75). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLO (96). This means that LW’s stock grew significantly faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KSTR14.920.95
+6.80%
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 ETF
JPUS117.09-1.25
-1.06%
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF
MPAY25.97-0.38
-1.44%
Akros Monthly Payout ETF
FNCL71.77-1.08
-1.48%
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF
SPD33.95-0.74
-2.12%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Dwnsd Cnvxty ETF

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+1.73%
GIS - FLO
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
CPB - FLO
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
CAG - FLO
54%
Loosely correlated
+3.82%
KHC - FLO
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.22%
SJM - FLO
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
More

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and RSGUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and RSGUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
-1.78%
RSGUF - LW
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
ATPC - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
K - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
USNA - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
FLO - LW
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
More