Ad is loading...
FLO
Price
$21.57
Change
-$0.26 (-1.19%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
80 days until earnings call
UTZ
Price
$16.30
Change
-$0.57 (-3.38%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs UTZ

Header iconFLO vs UTZ Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs UTZBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$21.57
Change-$0.26 (-1.19%)
Volume$1.99M
CapitalizationN/A
Utz Brands
Price$16.30
Change-$0.57 (-3.38%)
Volume$637.1K
CapitalizationN/A
FLO vs UTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. UTZ commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Sell and UTZ is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FLO: $21.57 vs. UTZ: $16.30)
Brand notoriety: FLO and UTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 186% vs. UTZ: 96%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. UTZ: $1.5B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. UTZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the long-term than UTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLO is a better buy in the short-term than UTZ.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +0.61% price change this week, while UTZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -6.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

UTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLO($5B) has a higher market cap than UTZ($1.5B). UTZ has higher P/E ratio than FLO: UTZ (81.45) vs FLO (40.74). UTZ YTD gains are higher at: 1.447 vs. FLO (-1.181). FLO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 345M vs. UTZ (99.2M). UTZ has more cash in the bank: 52M vs. FLO (22.5M). UTZ has less debt than FLO: UTZ (985M) vs FLO (1.35B). FLO has higher revenues than UTZ: FLO (5.09B) vs UTZ (1.44B).
FLOUTZFLO / UTZ
Capitalization5B1.5B333%
EBITDA345M99.2M348%
Gain YTD-1.1811.447-82%
P/E Ratio40.7481.4550%
Revenue5.09B1.44B354%
Total Cash22.5M52M43%
Total Debt1.35B985M137%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs UTZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
UTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1776
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6264
SMR RATING
1..100
7287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9295
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
755

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (15) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for UTZ (92) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (64) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (72) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (87) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

UTZ's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as FLO (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that UTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as UTZ (95) in the null industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to UTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOUTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VXZ49.940.98
+2.00%
iPath® B S&P 500® VIX Md-Trm Futs™ ETN
DISV26.810.06
+0.22%
Dimensional International Sm Cp Val ETF
DWAT11.85N/A
N/A
Arrow DWA Tactical Macro ETF
QABA60.72-0.11
-0.18%
First Trust NASDAQ® ABA Community Bk ETF
FYC78.66-1.15
-1.44%
First Trust Small Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-1.19%
GIS - FLO
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
CAG - FLO
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
CPB - FLO
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.92%
MDLZ - FLO
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
SJM - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
More

UTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UTZ has been loosely correlated with FLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UTZ jumps, then FLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UTZ
1D Price
Change %
UTZ100%
-3.38%
FLO - UTZ
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
CAG - UTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.73%
GIS - UTZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.32%
CPB - UTZ
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
POST - UTZ
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More