FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. FLPFX (24.8B). FLPFX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: FLPFX (2.30) vs FSWFX (0.84). FLPFX was incepted earlier than FSWFX: FLPFX (2 years) vs FSWFX (6 years). FLPFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FLPFX (22.00). FLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSWFX: FLPFX (0) vs FSWFX (250). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.15 vs. FLPFX (10.03).

	FLPFX	FSWFX	FLPFX / FSWFX
Total Expense Ratio	0.91	0.76	120%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.91	0.76	120%
Fund Existence	2 years	6 years	-
Gain YTD	18.433	17.458	106%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	24.8B	89B	28%
Annual Yield % from dividends	2.30	0.84	274%
Returns for 1 year	10.03	17.15	58%
Returns for 3 years	N/A	42.45	-
Returns for 5 years	N/A	-0.61	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	N/A	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
MLXAX	32.34	0.76	+2.41%
Catalyst Energy Infrastructure A
MIEJX	44.38	0.09	+0.20%
MFS International Equity A
TMCPX	60.64	0.09	+0.15%
Touchstone Mid Cap Y
DSMDX	23.77	0.03	+0.13%
Driehaus Small/Mid Cap Growth
USLCX	30.11	-0.16	-0.53%
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C