RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. FLPFX (24.8B). FLPFX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: FLPFX (2.30) vs RSLDX (0.80). FLPFX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: FLPFX (2 years) vs RSLDX (11 years). FLPFX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). RSLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. FLPFX (22.00). FLPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLDX: FLPFX (0) vs RSLDX (250). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.13 vs. FLPFX (10.03).

	FLPFX	RSLDX	FLPFX / RSLDX
Total Expense Ratio	0.91	0.80	114%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.91	0.80	114%
Fund Existence	2 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	18.433	17.422	106%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	24.8B	89B	28%
Annual Yield % from dividends	2.30	0.80	288%
Returns for 1 year	10.03	17.13	59%
Returns for 3 years	N/A	42.32	-
Returns for 5 years	N/A	-0.90	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	91.73	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
LMCTX	38.18	0.26	+0.69%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R5
LRSRX	15.67	0.06	+0.38%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
QBNRX	41.08	0.11	+0.27%
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap R6
TMPIX	60.92	0.09	+0.15%
Touchstone Mid Cap Institutional
SCMIX	302.18	-2.94	-0.96%
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst2