Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWACX
FLPKX vs HWACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and HWACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. HWACX (962M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWACX: FLPKX (1.97) vs HWACX (0.00). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWACX: FLPKX (18 years) vs HWACX (23 years). HWACX (1.93) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.79). HWACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. FLPKX (22.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWACX: FLPKX (0) vs HWACX (2500). HWACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.58 vs. FLPKX (4.62). HWACX return over 5 years is better than : 17.30 vs. FLPKX (-3.10).
| FLPKX | HWACX | FLPKX / HWACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.93 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.93 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.343 | 11.953 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 962M | 2,568% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.62 | 8.58 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.98 | 26.35 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.10 | 17.30 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.89 | 93.17 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement