Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWAZX
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWAZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
Price$40.02
Change-$0.08 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.89B
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opps Z
Price$40.66
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets762.19M
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWAZX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Hold and HWAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. HWAZX (762M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPKX (1.95) vs HWAZX (1.13). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPKX (18 years) vs HWAZX (6 years). HWAZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.79). HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FLPKX (22.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPKX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.78 vs. FLPKX (-6.71). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 53.38 vs. FLPKX (-8.10).
| FLPKX | HWAZX | FLPKX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.009 | 8.668 | -0% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.9B | 762M | 3,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 1.13 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.71 | -2.78 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.44 | 23.96 | -39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.10 | 53.38 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.52 | N/A | - |