Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPKX vs HWAZX
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPKX vs HWAZX
FLPKX vs HWAZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPKX vs. HWAZX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPKX is a Buy and HWAZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPKX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. HWAZX (934M). FLPKX pays higher dividends than HWAZX: FLPKX (2.07) vs HWAZX (1.12). FLPKX was incepted earlier than HWAZX: FLPKX (18 years) vs HWAZX (7 years). HWAZX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FLPKX (0.79). HWAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. FLPKX (22.00). FLPKX has a lower initial minimum investment than HWAZX: FLPKX (0) vs HWAZX (1000000). HWAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.41 vs. FLPKX (10.62). HWAZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.35 vs. FLPKX (-16.49).
| FLPKX | HWAZX | FLPKX / HWAZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.597 | 11.943 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 934M | 2,559% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.12 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 20.41 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.59 | 38.15 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.49 | 26.35 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers