Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs LMCFX
FLPSX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs LMCFX
FLPSX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. LMCFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Hold and LMCFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. LMCFX (1.2B). FLPSX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: FLPSX (2.05) vs LMCFX (0.53). FLPSX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: FLPSX (37 years) vs LMCFX (19 years). FLPSX (0.87) and LMCFX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX (0) and LMCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.49 vs. FLPSX (10.30). LMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. FLPSX (-13.61).
| FLPSX | LMCFX | FLPSX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.86 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.86 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.720 | 12.590 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 1.2B | 1,998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 0.53 | 388% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.30 | 17.49 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.59 | 33.91 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.61 | 15.00 | -91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.06 | 59.32 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement