Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs LMCFX
FLPSX vs LMCFX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs LMCFX
FLPSX vs LMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. LMCFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and LMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 24.7B vs. LMCFX (1.13B). FLPSX pays higher dividends than LMCFX: FLPSX (1.94) vs LMCFX (0.54). FLPSX was incepted earlier than LMCFX: FLPSX (37 years) vs LMCFX (19 years). FLPSX (0.87) and LMCFX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . LMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. FLPSX (22.00). FLPSX (0) and LMCFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. FLPSX (4.56). LMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.35 vs. FLPSX (-3.42).
| FLPSX | LMCFX | FLPSX / LMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.86 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.86 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.266 | 7.854 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7B | 1.13B | 2,184% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.54 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.56 | 6.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.75 | 23.20 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.42 | 9.35 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.48 | 46.91 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement