FLR
Price
$51.22
Change
+$0.08 (+0.16%)
Updated
Oct 8, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.58B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTZ
Price
$215.99
Change
-$7.38 (-3.30%)
Updated
Oct 8, 11:12 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.39B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLR vs MTZ

FLR vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLR vs. MTZ commentary
Oct 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR vs MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7831
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3964
SMR RATING
1..100
9855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLR's Valuation (72) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (78). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (64). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's SMR Rating (55) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (98). This means that MTZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (64). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTZ (90). This means that FLR’s stock grew significantly faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2026
Stock price -- (FLR: $51.14 vs. MTZ: $223.37)
Brand notoriety: FLR: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLR: 77% vs. MTZ: 85%
Market capitalization -- FLR: $6.58B vs. MTZ: $16.39B
FLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.58B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $16.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $69 to $2.15T. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTZ is a better buy in the short-term than FLR.

Price Growth

FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +6.81% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +4.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.02% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASAN9.330.04
+0.43%
Asana
VTAK1.51N/A
N/A
Catheter Precision Inc
MNRO13.64-0.03
-0.22%
Monro
FRMM4.76-0.10
-1.96%
Forum Markets Incorporated
BSY35.15-0.82
-2.28%
Bentley Systems

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
-1.65%
PWR - FLR
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
FIX - FLR
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
EME - FLR
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.83%
APG - FLR
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
MTZ - FLR
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
-2.16%
PWR - MTZ
74%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
FIX - MTZ
71%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
MYRG - MTZ
69%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
EME - MTZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-4.83%
DY - MTZ
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
More