Advertisement
FLRG vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLRG is a Hold and QCOM is a StrongBuy.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLRG | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% | 18 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WEMIX | 12.42 | 0.17 | +1.39% |
| Allspring Emerging Growth Inst | |||
| NWAMX | 36.15 | 0.23 | +0.64% |
| Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc K | |||
| NRGSX | 64.35 | 0.38 | +0.59% |
| Neuberger Berman Genesis R6 | |||
| MXMGX | 38.41 | 0.17 | +0.44% |
| Empower T. Rowe Price Mid Cp Gr Inv | |||
| EICGX | 16.95 | -0.09 | -0.53% |
| Eaton Vance China Equity I | |||
FLRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLRG has been closely correlated with QCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLRG jumps, then QCOM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLRG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLRG | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| QCOM - FLRG | 72% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| IBKR - FLRG | 69% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| EME - FLRG | 68% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| LRCX - FLRG | 67% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| CDNS - FLRG | 67% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| AMAT - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||