FLS
Price
$46.46
Change
-$1.28 (-2.68%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.99B
47 days until earnings call
GTLS
Price
$144.21
Change
-$3.79 (-2.56%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.76B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLS vs GTLS

Header iconFLS vs GTLS Comparison
Open Charts FLS vs GTLSBanner chart's image
Flowserve
Price$46.46
Change-$1.28 (-2.68%)
Volume$2.45M
Capitalization5.99B
Chart Industries
Price$144.21
Change-$3.79 (-2.56%)
Volume$833.75K
Capitalization6.76B
FLS vs GTLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLS vs. GTLS commentary
Jun 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a Hold and GTLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FLS: $46.46 vs. GTLS: $144.21)
Brand notoriety: FLS and GTLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLS: 123% vs. GTLS: 106%
Market capitalization -- FLS: $5.99B vs. GTLS: $6.76B
FLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $5.99B. GTLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $6.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than GTLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GTLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than GTLS.

Price Growth

FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -4.93% price change this week, while GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

GTLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.30% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLS($6.76B) has a higher market cap than FLS($5.99B). GTLS has higher P/E ratio than FLS: GTLS (363.57) vs FLS (32.38). FLS YTD gains are higher at: -18.890 vs. GTLS (-24.434). GTLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 561M vs. FLS (374M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 546M vs. GTLS (188M). FLS has less debt than GTLS: FLS (1.41B) vs GTLS (3.9B). FLS has higher revenues than GTLS: FLS (4.32B) vs GTLS (3.35B).
FLSGTLSFLS / GTLS
Capitalization5.99B6.76B89%
EBITDA374M561M67%
Gain YTD-18.890-24.43477%
P/E Ratio32.38363.579%
Revenue4.32B3.35B129%
Total Cash546M188M290%
Total Debt1.41B3.9B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS vs GTLS: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
GTLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4148
SMR RATING
1..100
5676
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1885

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (45) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (72). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (48). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (56) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (76). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (64). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (99). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLSGTLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSG16.140.72
+4.67%
ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors
PSDM50.99-0.09
-0.17%
PGIM Short Duration Mlt-Sect Bd ETF
DBEU45.55-0.62
-1.34%
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF
DINT25.02-0.38
-1.50%
Davis Select International ETF
EWY66.42-1.27
-1.88%
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
-2.68%
ITT - FLS
83%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
DOV - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
PH - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
EMR - FLS
78%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
GTLS - FLS
77%
Closely correlated
-2.56%
More

GTLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been closely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLS
1D Price
Change %
GTLS100%
-2.56%
FLS - GTLS
77%
Closely correlated
-2.68%
ITT - GTLS
74%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
PH - GTLS
69%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
NPO - GTLS
69%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
EMR - GTLS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
More