Advertisement
FLS vs KMT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Flowserve Corporation (FLS) vs. Kennametal Inc. (KMT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both FLS and KMT have delivered strong one-year gains, with KMT up over 100% and FLS around 88%, reflecting robust industrial sector momentum.
- FLS boasts higher profitability with a 14.35% operating margin (operating margin, a measure of operational efficiency) and 17.18% ROE (return on equity, profitability relative to shareholders' equity), compared to KMT's 10.23% and 8.86%.
- Recent FLS Q1 earnings showed revenue down 6.7% year-over-year to $1.07 billion but adjusted EPS (earnings per share) growth and margin expansion.
- KMT exhibits stronger recent price momentum, with YTD gains of 36% versus FLS's solid yearly performance, ahead of upcoming Q3 earnings.
- Both companies operate in the industrials sector but differ in focus: FLS on flow control equipment and KMT on precision tooling.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight potential in industrial stocks amid current market trends.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FLS and KMT, two industrials sector players benefiting from manufacturing resurgence and infrastructure spending. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors eyeing sector exposure will find value here. With both stocks showing significant gains amid broader market positioning, understanding their business models, recent momentum, and risk profiles aids informed decision-making in today's volatile environment.
FLS Overview and Recent Performance
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) designs and manufactures flow control systems, including pumps, valves, and seals, serving energy, chemical, and water industries. In recent market activity, FLS reported Q1 2026 results with sales of $1.068 billion, down 6.7% year-over-year due to project timing and regional softness, yet adjusted gross margins expanded through the Flowserve Business System (a proprietary operational improvement framework). Double-digit adjusted EPS growth and reaffirmed full-year guidance bolstered sentiment, despite a post-earnings price dip. The stock has risen approximately 88% over the past year, supported by strong aftermarket services and operational leverage, trading at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of 32.22 with a $10.87 billion market cap.
KMT Overview and Recent Performance
Kennametal Inc. (KMT) specializes in tungsten carbides, ceramics, and precision tooling for metal cutting and infrastructure applications across aerospace, automotive, and energy sectors. Recent weeks have seen continued price strength, with year-to-date gains of 36.36% and over 105% in the past year, outpacing many peers amid favorable industrial demand. Approaching Q3 fiscal 2026 earnings on May 6, analysts anticipate year-over-year EPS growth. Trading at a trailing P/E of 26.96 and $2.94 billion market cap, sentiment remains positive on consumables-driven business and market share gains, though cyclical exposure tempers enthusiasm.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available, each scanning thousands of tickers for optimal signals in stocks, ETFs, and crypto under current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend following, volatility plays, and multi-agent analysis, with impressive stats: annualized returns up to 163.65%, win rates from 51% to 88%, and trade durations spanning 15 minutes to 50 days. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots on NVDA and AMD (win rates ~80%, 3-ticker portfolios) and industrials/ETFs with 2x-3x leverage. Traders can copy these high-conviction signals with built-in risk management, such as 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors, to potentially enhance portfolio performance. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your timeframe and risk tolerance.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FLS and KMT share industrials sector exposure but diverge in models: FLS emphasizes engineered flow solutions with recurring aftermarket revenue (over 50% of sales), while KMT focuses on consumable tooling for high-wear applications. Growth drivers include infrastructure for both, but FLS benefits more from energy transition projects. Recent momentum favors KMT with superior one-year returns, yet FLS shows greater stability via higher ROE and margins. Risks involve cyclical downturns, with FLS more tied to oil/gas volatility and KMT to manufacturing slowdowns. Market sentiment tilts positive for both amid relative performance in industrials, trading at premium valuations reflective of earnings potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward FLS with higher probability for near-term outperformance, driven by recent earnings beat, margin expansion, superior profitability metrics, and consistent trend positioning in flow control demand. While KMT offers compelling momentum, FLS's catalysts suggest relatively stronger stability.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a StrongBuy and KMT is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +6.22% price change this week, while KMT (@Tools & Hardware) price change was +7.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +3.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
KMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+1.88% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (+3.28% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| FLS | KMT | FLS / KMT | |
| Capitalization | 9.98B | 2.67B | 374% |
| EBITDA | 710M | 360M | 197% |
| Gain YTD | 12.866 | 24.405 | 53% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.70 | 19.65 | 146% |
| Revenue | 4.65B | 2.14B | 218% |
| Total Cash | 792M | 107M | 740% |
| Total Debt | 1.89B | 660M | 286% |
FLS | KMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMT's Valuation (8) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (28). This means that KMT’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMT (100). This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's SMR Rating (53) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as KMT (70). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to KMT’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as KMT (47). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to KMT’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as KMT (32). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to KMT’s over the last 12 months.
| FLS | KMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SBU | 20.17 | 0.23 | +1.17% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF | |||
| TMFS | 34.73 | 0.34 | +0.98% |
| Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| JULP | 32.48 | 0.06 | +0.18% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jul | |||
| HDEF | 32.89 | 0.03 | +0.09% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Div Yld Eq ETF | |||
| IDLV | 35.20 | -0.03 | -0.09% |
| Invesco S&P Intl Dev Low Vol ETF | |||
FLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| FELE - FLS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ATMU - FLS | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| LECO - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| ITT - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.23% | ||
| KMT - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||
KMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMT has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMT jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMT | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| HLIO - KMT | 70% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| MIDD - KMT | 69% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| TNC - KMT | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| THR - KMT | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SXI - KMT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||