Advertisement
FLS vs LECO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Flowserve Corporation (FLS) vs. Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both FLS and LECO operate in the industrial manufacturing sector, with FLS focusing on flow control equipment and LECO on welding and cutting products.
- LECO shows stronger profitability with a 12.3% profit margin and 37.2% ROE (return on equity), compared to FLS's 7.3% margin and 17.2% ROE.
- FLS trades at a lower forward PE (price-to-earnings) ratio of 20.6 versus LECO's 23.9, suggesting relative value amid recent volatility.
- Over the past year, both stocks delivered strong gains, with FLS up over 80%.
- Recent FLS earnings showed revenue decline but stable adjusted EPS, while LECO anticipates growth ahead of its report.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight sector momentum that could benefit both in industrials.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FLS and LECO, two established players in industrial manufacturing. FLS specializes in pumps, valves, and seals for critical applications, while LECO leads in welding equipment and automation solutions. Traders seeking exposure to industrials amid infrastructure and energy transitions, or investors evaluating relative performance in a volatile market, will find value here. By analyzing recent trends, financial metrics, and market positioning, this review aids informed decisions on potential opportunities and risks in these stocks.
FLS Overview and Recent Performance
Flowserve Corporation (FLS) designs and manufactures flow control systems, including pumps, valves, and seals, serving oil & gas, chemical processing, and power generation sectors. With a market cap of approximately $10.9 billion, the company reported trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $4.73 billion and EPS of $2.64. In recent weeks, FLS shares experienced heightened volatility, particularly following Q1 2026 earnings that revealed a 6.7% year-over-year revenue drop to $1.07 billion, though adjusted EPS met expectations at $0.85. Sentiment has been influenced by margin improvements—operating margin at 14.4%—and strategic acquisitions in nuclear power, offsetting softer demand in some end markets. The stock's beta of 1.34 indicates above-average market sensitivity, contributing to its 82% gain over the past 52 weeks.
LECO Overview and Recent Performance
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) is a global leader in welding, cutting, and brazing products, with segments in Americas Welding, International Welding, and Harris Products Group. Its $14.1 billion market cap reflects TTM revenue of $4.23 billion and EPS of $9.32. Recent market activity for LECO has been relatively steady, with YTD gains of about 8% and a beta of 1.29. Key drivers include a recent dividend increase to $0.79 per share and strong Q4 2025 results that beat EPS estimates. Upcoming Q1 earnings are anticipated to show growth, bolstered by 17% operating margins and robust ROE. Exposure to automation and infrastructure supports positive sentiment, though shares remain below 52-week highs amid broader industrial cycles.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from short-term technical scans to longer-term fundamental approaches—tailored to current market conditions like AI infrastructure and industrials momentum. Featured bots display impressive stats, including annualized returns of 50-160%, win rates from 51-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and average trade durations spanning 1 day to 50 days. Examples target high-growth themes with profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10 for many. Traders can explore these for copy trading signals, filtering by volatility, assets, or sectors to match their style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FLS and LECO share industrial sector exposure but differ in business models: FLS emphasizes engineered flow solutions with aftermarket services, while LECO focuses on consumables and automation integration. Growth drivers for FLS include energy transition projects, contrasting LECO's strength in fabrication and infrastructure. Recent momentum favors LECO's steadier trajectory versus FLS's post-earnings pullback. Risk factors involve cyclical demand for both, with FLS showing higher revenue volatility (3.5% quarterly growth) but lower debt/equity at 78% compared to LECO's 92%. Market sentiment leans toward LECO for superior margins, though FLS offers a valuation discount on forward metrics.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently favors LECO due to its consistent trend stability, higher ROE and profit margins, and positive analyst positioning ahead of earnings. While FLS presents value through a lower forward PE and recovery potential from recent dips, LECO's stronger catalysts in automation and dividends provide a probabilistic edge in the near term for risk-adjusted positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a Hold and LECO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLECO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LECO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LECO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LECO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -3.25% price change this week, while LECO (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.07%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
LECO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-1.15% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (-1.55% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| FLS | LECO | FLS / LECO | |
| Capitalization | 9.25B | 14.2B | 65% |
| EBITDA | 710M | 849M | 84% |
| Gain YTD | 4.890 | 11.594 | 42% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.57 | 27.26 | 101% |
| Revenue | 4.65B | 4.35B | 107% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.89B | 1.31B | 144% |
FLS | LECO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLS's Valuation (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LECO (82). This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LECO’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (42). This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's SMR Rating (25) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (53). This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as FLS (53). This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as LECO (45). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to LECO’s over the last 12 months.
| FLS | LECO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 20 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 12 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 45% |
Advertisement
FLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with FELE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then FELE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLS | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| FELE - FLS | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ATMU - FLS | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| LECO - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| KMT - FLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| ITT - FLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||
LECO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LECO has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LECO jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LECO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LECO | 100% | N/A | ||
| GGG - LECO | 74% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| DOV - LECO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| DCI - LECO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| ZWS - LECO | 70% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| FELE - LECO | 70% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||