Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLTMX vs FZICX
FLTMX vs FZICX Comparison
Open Charts FLTMX vs FZICX
FLTMX vs FZICX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLTMX vs. FZICX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTMX is a Hold and FZICX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTMX (13.9B) and FZICX (13.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FLTMX pays higher dividends than FZICX: FLTMX (2.98) vs FZICX (1.92). FLTMX was incepted earlier than FZICX: FLTMX (49 years) vs FZICX (21 years). FZICX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FLTMX (0.39). FLTMX (15.00) and FZICX (15.00) have comparable annual turnover. FLTMX (0) and FZICX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FLTMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.54 vs. FZICX (-1.67). FLTMX return over 5 years is better than : 3.05 vs. FZICX (-2.15).
| FLTMX | FZICX | FLTMX / FZICX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.42 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.42 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.878 | -2.559 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 13.9B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 1.92 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.54 | -1.67 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.02 | 5.65 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.05 | -2.15 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.40 | 6.50 | 283% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers