Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLTMX vs HMKAX
FLTMX vs HMKAX Comparison
Open Charts FLTMX vs HMKAX
FLTMX vs HMKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLTMX vs. HMKAX commentary
Aug 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTMX is a Hold and HMKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTMX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. HMKAX (71.4M). HMKAX (3.05) and FLTMX (2.96) have matching dividends . FLTMX was incepted earlier than HMKAX: FLTMX (49 years) vs HMKAX (11 years). HMKAX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FLTMX (0.39). HMKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FLTMX (15.00). FLTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMKAX: FLTMX (0) vs HMKAX (2000). HMKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. FLTMX (3.37). FLTMX return over 5 years is better than : 4.92 vs. HMKAX (0.67).
| FLTMX | HMKAX | FLTMX / HMKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.69 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.84 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.057 | 0.372 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 71.4M | 19,468% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 3.05 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.37 | 4.43 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.05 | 12.05 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.92 | 0.67 | 736% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.95 | 18.62 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers