Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLTMX vs HMKCX
FLTMX vs HMKCX Comparison
Open Charts FLTMX vs HMKCX
FLTMX vs HMKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLTMX vs. HMKCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTMX is a Hold and HMKCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTMX has more cash in the bank: 13.9B vs. HMKCX (70.3M). FLTMX pays higher dividends than HMKCX: FLTMX (2.96) vs HMKCX (2.10). FLTMX was incepted earlier than HMKCX: FLTMX (49 years) vs HMKCX (11 years). HMKCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FLTMX (0.39). HMKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FLTMX (15.00). FLTMX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMKCX: FLTMX (0) vs HMKCX (2000). HMKCX (3.87) and FLTMX (3.68) have marching annual gain over last year. FLTMX return over 5 years is better than : 4.33 vs. HMKCX (-3.66).
| FLTMX | HMKCX | FLTMX / HMKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.44 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.68 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.255 | -0.160 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 70.3M | 19,772% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.10 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.68 | 3.87 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.61 | 7.78 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.33 | -3.66 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.82 | 12.16 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers