Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLTMX vs RBCUX
FLTMX vs RBCUX Comparison
Open Charts FLTMX vs RBCUX
FLTMX vs RBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLTMX vs. RBCUX commentary
Jun 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTMX is a Hold and RBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBCUX has more cash in the bank: 6.72B vs. FLTMX (2M). RBCUX pays higher dividends than FLTMX: RBCUX (3.65) vs FLTMX (2.88). FLTMX was incepted earlier than RBCUX: FLTMX (49 years) vs RBCUX (9 years). RBCUX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FLTMX (0.39). RBCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. FLTMX (15.00). FLTMX (0) and RBCUX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RBCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.01 vs. FLTMX (5.51). FLTMX return over 5 years is better than : 6.44 vs. RBCUX (2.68).
| FLTMX | RBCUX | FLTMX / RBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.41 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.57 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 49 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.912 | 1.847 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2M | 6.72B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.65 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 6.01 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.13 | 12.00 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.44 | 2.68 | 241% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement