Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLUAX vs RMEBX
FLUAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLUAX vs RMEBX
FLUAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLUAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FLUAX (787M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FLUAX: RMEBX (1.04) vs FLUAX (0.89). FLUAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FLUAX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FLUAX (1.11) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . FLUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FLUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FLUAX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FLUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. RMEBX (10.14). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. FLUAX (24.87).
| FLUAX | RMEBX | FLUAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.07 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.07 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.852 | 6.444 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.04 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.08 | 10.14 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.75 | 34.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.87 | 35.62 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.15 | 94.57 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement