Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLUAX vs RMEBX
FLUAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLUAX vs RMEBX
FLUAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLUAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLUAX (827M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FLUAX: RMEBX (0.99) vs FLUAX (0.84). FLUAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FLUAX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FLUAX (1.11) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . FLUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FLUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FLUAX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FLUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.61 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. FLUAX (30.37).
| FLUAX | RMEBX | FLUAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.07 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.07 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.470 | 10.367 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.61 | 9.03 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.04 | 38.30 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.37 | 35.75 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.93 | 90.55 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers