Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLUAX vs RMFEX
FLUAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FLUAX vs RMFEX
FLUAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLUAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLUAX (827M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FLUAX: RMFEX (1.41) vs FLUAX (0.84). FLUAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FLUAX (19 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FLUAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FLUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FLUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FLUAX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FLUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. RMFEX (9.45). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.25 vs. FLUAX (28.41).
| FLUAX | RMFEX | FLUAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.519 | 9.694 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.41 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.52 | 9.45 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.72 | 34.42 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.41 | 39.25 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.20 | 100.56 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement