Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLUAX vs RMFEX
FLUAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FLUAX vs RMFEX
FLUAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLUAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLUAX (792M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FLUAX: RMFEX (1.42) vs FLUAX (0.87). FLUAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FLUAX (19 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FLUAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FLUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FLUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FLUAX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FLUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.58 vs. RMFEX (9.23). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.39 vs. FLUAX (26.23).
| FLUAX | RMFEX | FLUAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.802 | 9.303 | 84% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.58 | 9.23 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.11 | 36.13 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.23 | 39.39 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.08 | 99.14 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement