Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLUTX vs RMEBX
FLUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLUTX vs RMEBX
FLUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUTX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLUTX (827M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FLUTX: RMEBX (0.99) vs FLUTX (0.62). FLUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FLUTX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FLUTX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FLUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FLUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FLUTX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FLUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.98 vs. RMEBX (8.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.48 vs. FLUTX (27.21).
| FLUTX | RMEBX | FLUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.823 | 10.468 | 122% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.99 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.98 | 8.11 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.12 | 37.87 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.21 | 35.48 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.95 | 92.43 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers