Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLUTX vs RMEBX
FLUTX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FLUTX vs RMEBX
FLUTX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLUTX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUTX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FLUTX (787M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FLUTX: RMEBX (1.04) vs FLUTX (0.66). FLUTX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FLUTX (19 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FLUTX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). FLUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FLUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FLUTX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FLUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. RMEBX (9.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.79 vs. FLUTX (19.82).
| FLUTX | RMEBX | FLUTX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.381 | 6.885 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 787M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.04 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.29 | 9.16 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.32 | 33.97 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.82 | 33.79 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.24 | 92.81 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement