Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLUTX vs RMFCX
FLUTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FLUTX vs RMFCX
FLUTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLUTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUTX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FLUTX (827M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FLUTX: RMFCX (1.15) vs FLUTX (0.62). FLUTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FLUTX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FLUTX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FLUTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FLUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FLUTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FLUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.98 vs. RMFCX (8.21). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.40 vs. FLUTX (27.21).
| FLUTX | RMFCX | FLUTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.823 | 10.556 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 827M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.15 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.98 | 8.21 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.12 | 38.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.21 | 36.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.95 | 94.12 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement