FLWS
Price
$5.03
Change
+$0.12 (+2.44%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
83 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$50.26
Change
+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs RUSHA

Header iconFLWS vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs RUSHABanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$5.03
Change+$0.12 (+2.44%)
Volume$449.58K
Capitalization698.5M
Rush Enterprises
Price$50.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
Volume$410.57K
Capitalization4.12B
FLWS vs RUSHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. RUSHA commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a StrongBuy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $5.03 vs. RUSHA: $50.27)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. RUSHA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 64% vs. RUSHA: 77%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. RUSHA: $4.12B
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. RUSHA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than FLWS.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.37% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUSHA($4.12B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than RUSHA: FLWS (156.25) vs RUSHA (12.75). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: -7.621 vs. FLWS (-38.372). RUSHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 737M vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. RUSHA (184M). FLWS has less debt than RUSHA: FLWS (318M) vs RUSHA (1.81B). RUSHA has higher revenues than FLWS: RUSHA (7.93B) vs FLWS (1.91B).
FLWSRUSHAFLWS / RUSHA
Capitalization699M4.12B17%
EBITDA1.43M737M0%
Gain YTD-38.372-7.621504%
P/E Ratio156.2512.751,225%
Revenue1.91B7.93B24%
Total Cash312M184M170%
Total Debt318M1.81B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
9455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
221
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (26) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (85) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (94) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as FLWS (89) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as RUSHA (21) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFDPX38.350.09
+0.24%
DF Dent Premier Growth Investor
VPACX15.23N/A
N/A
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Investor
ADKSX29.60N/A
N/A
Adirondack Small Cap
MTERX55.42N/A
N/A
MFS Technology R2
HWSZX68.84N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Z

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
+2.55%
RH - FLWS
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
RUSHA - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
PAG - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
GPI - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
ARHS - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
+0.10%
RUSHB - RUSHA
87%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
AN - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
LAD - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
ABG - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
PAG - RUSHA
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
More