Advertisement
FLWS vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Hold and RUSHA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLWS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +6.64% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +1.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLWS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-1.11% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+0.02% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| FLWS | RUSHA | FLWS / RUSHA | |
| Capitalization | 286M | 4.05B | 7% |
| EBITDA | -144.3M | 682M | -21% |
| Gain YTD | -44.920 | -6.120 | 734% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 14.50 | - |
| Revenue | 1.69B | 7.69B | 22% |
| Total Cash | 46.5M | 211M | 22% |
| Total Debt | 271M | 1.75B | 15% |
FLWS | RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (34) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (83) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's SMR Rating (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (98) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as FLWS (89) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUSHA (42) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
| FLWS | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 44% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AAGPX | 24.60 | N/A | N/A |
| American Beacon Large Cap Value Inv | |||
| VRGWX | 920.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index I | |||
| TRACX | 17.64 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val C | |||
| SBHCX | 12.70 | N/A | N/A |
| Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Cre Ret | |||
| QRSIX | 43.96 | N/A | N/A |
| FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Instl | |||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 86% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||