FLWS
Price
$5.39
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
342.61M
11 days until earnings call
TBHC
Price
$1.58
Change
+$0.05 (+3.27%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
35.49M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs TBHC

Header iconFLWS vs TBHC Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs TBHCBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$5.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$290.63K
Capitalization342.61M
THE BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE
Price$1.58
Change+$0.05 (+3.27%)
Volume$309.9K
Capitalization35.49M
FLWS vs TBHC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. TBHC commentary
Aug 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Hold and TBHC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $5.39 vs. TBHC: $1.58)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. TBHC: Not notable
FLWS represents the Specialty Stores, while TBHC is part of the Home Improvement Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 44% vs. TBHC: 84%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $342.61M vs. TBHC: $35.49M
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $342.61M. TBHC’s [@Home Improvement Chains] market capitalization is $35.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.63B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry ranges from $410.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Improvement Chains] industry is $45.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBHC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBHC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FLWS and TBHC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TBHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBHC is a better buy in the short-term than FLWS.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.28% price change this week, while TBHC (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was +6.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.42%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

TBHC is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.31% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Home Improvement Chains (+3.70% weekly)

The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLWS($343M) has a higher market cap than TBHC($35.5M). TBHC YTD gains are higher at: -2.469 vs. FLWS (-34.027).
FLWSTBHCFLWS / TBHC
Capitalization343M35.5M966%
EBITDA-121.63MN/A-
Gain YTD-34.027-2.4691,378%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.71BN/A-
Total Cash84.7MN/A-
Total Debt279MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs TBHC: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
TBHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9568
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
196
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TBHC's Valuation (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (82) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that TBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's SMR Rating (97) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as TBHC (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew similarly to TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TBHC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (65) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that TBHC’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for TBHC (96) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew significantly faster than TBHC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSTBHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISNPY39.770.66
+1.69%
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.
EOGSF2.550.04
+1.59%
Emerald Oil & Gas NL
IGIFF35.240.12
+0.36%
IGM Financial Inc.
HLTRF3.80N/A
N/A
HLS Therapeutics Inc.
DMEHF0.14N/A
-2.30%
Desert Mountain Energy Corp.

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
+0.19%
RH - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
+11.39%
RUSHA - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.73%
HZO - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+9.73%
HVT - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.89%
ARHS - FLWS
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
More

TBHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TBHC has been loosely correlated with FLWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TBHC jumps, then FLWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBHC
1D Price
Change %
TBHC100%
+3.27%
FLWS - TBHC
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
HZO - TBHC
36%
Loosely correlated
+9.73%
HNST - TBHC
35%
Loosely correlated
+11.41%
RH - TBHC
35%
Loosely correlated
+11.39%
LE - TBHC
33%
Loosely correlated
+4.19%
More