Advertisement
FLY vs HLSQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLY is a Hold and HLSQ is a Hold.
| FLY | HLSQ | FLY / HLSQ | |
| Capitalization | 3.43B | 2.61M | 131,367% |
| EBITDA | -341.66M | -42.86M | 797% |
| Gain YTD | -8.404 | -48.283 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 287M | 332K | 86,446% |
| Total Cash | 635M | 572K | 111,014% |
| Total Debt | 53.4M | 3.37M | 1,583% |
FLY | HLSQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 25 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLY's Valuation (23) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HLSQ (33) in the null industry. This means that FLY’s stock grew similarly to HLSQ’s over the last 12 months.
FLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HLSQ (100) in the null industry. This means that FLY’s stock grew similarly to HLSQ’s over the last 12 months.
FLY's SMR Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HLSQ (100) in the null industry. This means that FLY’s stock grew similarly to HLSQ’s over the last 12 months.
HLSQ's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLY (84) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that HLSQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLY’s over the last 12 months.
FLY's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as HLSQ (52) in the null industry. This means that FLY’s stock grew similarly to HLSQ’s over the last 12 months.
| FLY | HLSQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while HLSQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HLSQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLSQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HLSQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FLY (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -10.52% price change this week, while HLSQ (@Information Technology Services) price change was +523.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -2.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.72%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-2.96% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
@Information Technology Services (+2.11% weekly)The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
Advertisement
FLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLY has been closely correlated with RKLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLY jumps, then RKLB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLY | 100% | -4.07% | ||
| RKLB - FLY | 69% Closely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| LUNR - FLY | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| RDW - FLY | 63% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| SIDU - FLY | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| SATL - FLY | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.54% | ||
More | ||||
HLSQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLSQ has been loosely correlated with NIKI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLSQ jumps, then NIKI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLSQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLSQ | 100% | -9.62% | ||
| NIKI - HLSQ | 60% Loosely correlated | -13.18% | ||
| RDW - HLSQ | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.48% | ||
| FLY - HLSQ | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.07% | ||
| NRIX - HLSQ | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.70% | ||
| AVTX - HLSQ | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||