Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLYCX vs RWMFX
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FLYCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Large Cap Select C
Price$38.76
Change+$0.16 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.94M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLYCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. FLYCX (47.9M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FLYCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FLYCX (0.00). FLYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FLYCX (23 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FLYCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs FLYCX (3000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. FLYCX (-4.81). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.02 vs. FLYCX (20.10).
| FLYCX | RWMFX | FLYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.31 | 568% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.31 | 652% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.380 | 8.905 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.9M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.81 | 4.59 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.98 | 29.92 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.10 | 45.02 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.76 | 72.75 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement