Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLYCX vs RWMFX
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FLYCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Large Cap Select C
Price$39.10
Change-$0.23 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.9M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.35
Change-$0.17 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.3B
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. FLYCX (48.9M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FLYCX: RWMFX (1.42) vs FLYCX (0.00). FLYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FLYCX (23 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FLYCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs FLYCX (3000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. FLYCX (1.68). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.63 vs. FLYCX (26.09).
| FLYCX | RWMFX | FLYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.31 | 568% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.31 | 652% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.468 | 10.714 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.9M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.68 | 7.06 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.00 | 45.97 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.09 | 52.63 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.80 | 82.50 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement