Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLYCX vs RWMFX
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FLYCX vs RWMFX
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. FLYCX (50.9M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FLYCX: RWMFX (1.40) vs FLYCX (0.00). FLYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FLYCX (23 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FLYCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs FLYCX (3000). FLYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.94 vs. RWMFX (8.10). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. FLYCX (3.32).
| FLYCX | RWMFX | FLYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.31 | 568% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.31 | 648% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.895 | 5.575 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.9M | 214B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.94 | 8.10 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.02 | 33.11 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.32 | 26.71 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.21 | 85.42 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement