Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMACX vs RGACX
FMACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMACX vs RGACX
FMACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMACX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMACX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FMACX (94.9B). FMACX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMACX (10 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMACX (0.33). FMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMACX: RGACX (250) vs FMACX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. FMACX (-0.79). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. FMACX (5.83).
| FMACX | RGACX | FMACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.93 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.93 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.573 | 5.397 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.9B | 357B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.79 | 0.93 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.44 | 33.65 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.83 | 10.91 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers