Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMACX vs RGACX
FMACX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMACX vs RGACX
FMACX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMACX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMACX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMACX (97.1B). FMACX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMACX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMACX (9 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FMACX (0.33). FMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMACX: RGACX (250) vs FMACX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. FMACX (6.11). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. FMACX (8.45).
| FMACX | RGACX | FMACX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.93 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.93 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.130 | 6.185 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 7.94 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.40 | 43.05 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.45 | 13.23 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement