Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMACX vs RGAFX
FMACX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts FMACX vs RGAFX
FMACX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMACX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMACX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMACX (97.1B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than FMACX: RGAFX (0.46) vs FMACX (0.00). FMACX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: FMACX (9 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). RGAFX (0.34) and FMACX (0.33) have similar cost to investors . FMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMACX: RGAFX (250) vs FMACX (1000000). FMACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. RGAFX (8.50). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.50 vs. FMACX (12.60).
| FMACX | RGAFX | FMACX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.34 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.34 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.280 | 6.429 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.56 | 8.50 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.34 | 47.12 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.60 | 19.50 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement