Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMACX vs RGAGX
FMACX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FMACX vs RGAGX
FMACX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMACX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMACX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMACX (94.5B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FMACX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FMACX (0.00). FMACX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FMACX (10 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FMACX (0.33) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMACX: RGAGX (250) vs FMACX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. FMACX (-3.87). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. FMACX (3.23).
| FMACX | RGAGX | FMACX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.29 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.29 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.080 | 9.321 | -22% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.5B | 353B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.87 | 0.49 | -792% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.48 | 44.65 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.23 | 15.00 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers