Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMACX vs RGAGX
FMACX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FMACX vs RGAGX
FMACX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMACX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMACX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMACX (97.1B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FMACX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FMACX (0.00). FMACX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FMACX (9 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FMACX (0.33) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMACX: RGAGX (250) vs FMACX (1000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FMACX (6.11). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. FMACX (8.45).
| FMACX | RGAGX | FMACX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.29 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.29 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.130 | 8.887 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | 12.55 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.40 | 50.34 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.45 | 20.99 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 122.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement