Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMACX vs VIGRX
FMACX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts FMACX vs VIGRX
FMACX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMACX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMACX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 365B vs. FMACX (93.8B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than FMACX: VIGRX (0.26) vs FMACX (0.00). FMACX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: FMACX (9 years) vs VIGRX (34 years). FMACX (0.33) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). FMACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. VIGRX (12.00). VIGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMACX: VIGRX (0) vs FMACX (1000000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.14 vs. FMACX (13.65). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 102.52 vs. FMACX (19.00).
| FMACX | VIGRX | FMACX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.17 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.33 | 0.17 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.290 | 11.002 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.8B | 365B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | 30.14 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.02 | 99.80 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.00 | 102.52 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 401.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement