Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAGX vs GFAFX
FMAGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FMAGX vs GFAFX
FMAGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAGX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMAGX (36.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FMAGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FMAGX (0.00). FMAGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FMAGX (63 years) vs GFAFX (26 years). GFAFX (0.65) and FMAGX (0.64) have similar cost to investors . FMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). FMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FMAGX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.04 vs. FMAGX (-5.63). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.61 vs. FMAGX (4.76).
| FMAGX | GFAFX | FMAGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.65 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.65 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 63 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.074 | 11.505 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 353B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.63 | 1.04 | -541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.59 | 52.66 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 16.61 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.29 | 106.63 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement