Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAGX vs RGAGX
FMAGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FMAGX vs RGAGX
FMAGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAGX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMAGX (37.9B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FMAGX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FMAGX (0.00). FMAGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FMAGX (63 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FMAGX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FMAGX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. FMAGX (3.81). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 21.56 vs. FMAGX (16.69).
| FMAGX | RGAGX | FMAGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.29 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.29 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 63 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.946 | 7.534 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9B | 361B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.81 | 10.79 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.75 | 46.62 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.69 | 21.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.84 | 115.30 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers