Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAGX vs RGEBX
FMAGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMAGX vs RGEBX
FMAGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FMAGX (36.5B). FMAGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMAGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FMAGX (63 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FMAGX (0.64). FMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FMAGX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.24 vs. FMAGX (-5.63). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 13.19 vs. FMAGX (4.76).
| FMAGX | RGEBX | FMAGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 63 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.074 | 11.166 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 353B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.63 | 0.24 | -2,392% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.59 | 49.51 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.76 | 13.19 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.29 | 97.94 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement