Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAGX vs RGEBX
FMAGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMAGX vs RGEBX
FMAGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAGX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FMAGX (37.9B). FMAGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMAGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FMAGX (63 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FMAGX (0.64). FMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FMAGX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.39 vs. FMAGX (3.81). FMAGX (16.69) and RGEBX (15.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FMAGX | RGEBX | FMAGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 63 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.946 | 7.135 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.9B | 361B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.81 | 9.39 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.75 | 41.68 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.69 | 15.95 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.84 | 102.25 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers