Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAGX vs RGEBX
FMAGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMAGX vs RGEBX
FMAGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAGX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FMAGX (36.7B). FMAGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMAGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FMAGX (63 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FMAGX (0.64). FMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FMAGX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.28 vs. FMAGX (-2.94). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 11.53 vs. FMAGX (5.25).
| FMAGX | RGEBX | FMAGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.08 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 63 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.946 | 10.214 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.7B | 342B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.94 | 3.28 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.05 | 44.39 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.25 | 11.53 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.25 | 96.02 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers