Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAMX vs GFACX
FMAMX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FMAMX vs GFACX
FMAMX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAMX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAMX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FMAMX (10.8B). FMAMX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FMAMX (0.19) vs GFACX (0.00). FMAMX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FMAMX (14 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FMAMX (0.79). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FMAMX (13.00). FMAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FMAMX (0) vs GFACX (250). FMAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.45 vs. GFACX (11.27). FMAMX return over 5 years is better than : 63.75 vs. GFACX (13.16).
| FMAMX | GFACX | FMAMX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.35 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.35 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.694 | 9.747 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 338B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.45 | 11.27 | 279% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.44 | 43.89 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.75 | 13.16 | 484% |
| Returns for 10 years | 207.92 | 87.56 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement