Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAMX vs GFAFX
FMAMX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FMAMX vs GFAFX
FMAMX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAMX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAMX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. FMAMX (10.8B). GFAFX (0.20) and FMAMX (0.19) have matching dividends . FMAMX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FMAMX (14 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). FMAMX (0.79) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FMAMX (13.00). FMAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FMAMX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FMAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.71 vs. GFAFX (14.87). FMAMX return over 5 years is better than : 64.65 vs. GFAFX (24.95).
| FMAMX | GFAFX | FMAMX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.65 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.65 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.302 | 10.425 | 147% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 338B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.20 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.71 | 14.87 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.88 | 53.27 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.65 | 24.95 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 206.88 | 112.87 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement