Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAMX vs RGAGX
FMAMX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FMAMX vs RGAGX
FMAMX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAMX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAMX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. FMAMX (11B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FMAMX: RGAGX (0.52) vs FMAMX (0.19). FMAMX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FMAMX (14 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FMAMX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FMAMX (13.00). FMAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FMAMX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FMAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.65 vs. RGAGX (5.99). FMAMX return over 5 years is better than : 60.50 vs. RGAGX (19.07).
| FMAMX | RGAGX | FMAMX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.29 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.587 | 9.656 | 182% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 342B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.52 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.65 | 5.99 | 395% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.10 | 49.02 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.50 | 19.07 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.87 | 105.26 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers