Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCAX vs FSMDX
FMCAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FMCAX vs FSMDX
FMCAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCAX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. FMCAX (2.54B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FMCAX: FSMDX (0.99) vs FMCAX (0.28). FMCAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FMCAX (30 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FMCAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FMCAX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMCAX (23.71) and FSMDX (22.95) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.87 vs. FMCAX (13.37).
| FMCAX | FSMDX | FMCAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.973 | 13.431 | 156% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 51.5B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.99 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.71 | 22.95 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.76 | 59.87 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.37 | 43.87 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | 178.20 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers