Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCAX vs FSMDX
FMCAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FMCAX vs FSMDX
FMCAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCAX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. FMCAX (2.67B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FMCAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs FMCAX (0.27). FMCAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FMCAX (30 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FMCAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FMCAX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. FMCAX (17.63). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. FMCAX (15.37).
| FMCAX | FSMDX | FMCAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.487 | 14.947 | 137% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 53.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 0.76 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.63 | 19.67 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.66 | 52.50 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.37 | 45.89 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.04 | 165.79 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers