Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCAX vs FSMDX
FMCAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FMCAX vs FSMDX
FMCAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. FMCAX (2.76B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FMCAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs FMCAX (0.28). FMCAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FMCAX (31 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). FMCAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FMCAX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. FMCAX (10.55). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. FMCAX (10.04).
| FMCAX | FSMDX | FMCAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.03 | 4,880% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.964 | 13.837 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.76B | 53.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.75 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 13.26 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.82 | 56.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.04 | 40.31 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.47 | 167.00 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers